jbo5112's Recent Posts
Sorry, that was 185,000,000, and it would have been in the 10's or 100's of billions if I had decided to boost production of atmosphere with everything else. I currently have 160 alien condensers, with another 60 waiting to build, but my alien artifact and uranium production are too low for all of my expansion ambitions. I'm also letting my trash build up, but the fantasy land arcologies are fairly clean for the population they hold.
With the new 0.44 update, "Once atmosphere surpasses the 15 million mark, colonists will begin getting sick." My atmosphere is around 185,000. Any suggestions on dropping this by 170,000? Based on crude estimates, i'm forecasting a month if my colony manages to run non-stop.
I'm glad I never went back to bump my atmosphere generation with everything else. It would probably easily be in the millions, if not 10's or 100's of millions.
I'm glad I never went back to bump my atmosphere generation with everything else. It would probably easily be in the millions, if not 10's or 100's of millions.
Mine kept producing when my uranium ran to zero, but they probably kept getting some share of whatever was in production.
I wanted to post this under the 0.43 bug, since the problem seems similar, but it's marked as fixed and locked. I had several bots that said they were building, but spent all night next to where they were supposed to be working. I have autosave turned off, and was trying to save and exit. Usually that fixes the problem. Instead, it looked like it was going to get stuck at "cleaning data" and eventually just gave me a white screen.
I'm posting this because I thought the JS stacktrace might possibly be helpful, and I'd like to help out. I'm running this on 64-bit Ubuntu (technically Linux Mint).
<--- Last few GCs --->
[15439:0x28cb069e1000] 207752593 ms: Mark-sweep 2032.7 (2214.2) -> 2032.6 (2167.7) MB, 1426.6 / 159.2 ms last resort
[15439:0x28cb069e1000] 207753843 ms: Mark-sweep 2032.6 (2167.7) -> 2032.6 (2152.7) MB, 1249.4 / 132.8 ms last resort
<--- JS stacktrace --->
==== JS stack trace =========================================
Security context: 0x1428b65a0bc9 <String[7]: file://>
1: push(this=0x9cc0dc02289 <JS Array[1454501]>)
2: Uint8ArrayConstructByIterable(aka Uint8ArrayConstructByIterable) [native typedarray.js:~201] [pc=0x6b0709be588](this=0x1a2aa7902311 <undefined>,Z=0x9cc0dc02201 <an Uint8Array with map 0xf8526ca73a9>,al=0x9cc0dc02421 <JS Array[1689041]>,am=0x12fc60204f49 <JS Function values (SharedFunctionInfo 0x1a2aa79500e9)>)
4: new constr...
I'm posting this because I thought the JS stacktrace might possibly be helpful, and I'd like to help out. I'm running this on 64-bit Ubuntu (technically Linux Mint).
<--- Last few GCs --->
[15439:0x28cb069e1000] 207752593 ms: Mark-sweep 2032.7 (2214.2) -> 2032.6 (2167.7) MB, 1426.6 / 159.2 ms last resort
[15439:0x28cb069e1000] 207753843 ms: Mark-sweep 2032.6 (2167.7) -> 2032.6 (2152.7) MB, 1249.4 / 132.8 ms last resort
<--- JS stacktrace --->
==== JS stack trace =========================================
Security context: 0x1428b65a0bc9 <String[7]: file://>
1: push(this=0x9cc0dc02289 <JS Array[1454501]>)
2: Uint8ArrayConstructByIterable(aka Uint8ArrayConstructByIterable) [native typedarray.js:~201] [pc=0x6b0709be588](this=0x1a2aa7902311 <undefined>,Z=0x9cc0dc02201 <an Uint8Array with map 0xf8526ca73a9>,al=0x9cc0dc02421 <JS Array[1689041]>,am=0x12fc60204f49 <JS Function values (SharedFunctionInfo 0x1a2aa79500e9)>)
4: new constr...
jbo5112
Member
Member Since
September 16th, 2017